Why We Crave Horror Paper

Essay 5 Position Paper50 pts Description4-5 pages, double-spaced, plus a separate MLA-format workings Cited page SkillsEverything DueFirst DraftFriday, 10 celestial latitude (in-class word) Final DraftMonday, 13 December (Submit during Final Exam time 245-445pm) SourcesReading Critically, Writing Well (RC) pp. 517-534, 582-595 Stephen King, Why We Crave Horror, bow down End Fritz Leiber, Smoke Ghost Algernon Blackwood, The Empty House Noel Carroll, The Nature of Horror (optional)For your final paper, you will be required to make use of the above resources to explain, support, and defend your daub against critique on the subject of abomination in the absence of easily identifiable violence, gore, or monsters. You may argue with or against King and Carroll, or provide your own definition of crime and how it anticipates gore-less horror better than previous definitions. Since there are no right or wrong answers in this discussion, you will be judged on the strength of your argumen t for your position and how you present your abridgment. Assignment ) Present the issue. Summarize the King and Carroll definitions of horror and their successes/failings. Establish your credibility by liberally discussing previous arguments on the function of horror. o Make sure to avoid emotional/personal opinions and sooner stick to the texts. 2) Assert your position. Give examples from the readings that fit well/do not fit with the definition of horror as presented by King and Carroll. o Critique your own analysis using any of the growing Your Argument skills (RC pp. 360-361), as well as Evaluating the Logic of an Argument (p. 24-640. 3) Argue directly for your position. Continue to produce your credibility with your audience by showing how your position alters/upholds the definition of horror as established. o Be willing to take a side in the argument, but avoid setting up straw-man arguments for the opposition. Carroll and/or King dont have to be wrong for you to be rig ht.4) Critique any relevant counter-arguments, objections, questions, or alternatives. Since no position will be perfect, try to accommodate any concerns or issues relating to your discussion of horror. Options (you may choose one or all) ? Accommodation modify your position to suit relevant objections. ? falsifying show the reader that any likely alternatives will not be as in force(p) in describing the function of horror as you see it. ? Integration demonstrate how your position can work together with other options to provide a more comprehensive take on the horror genre.Criteria for Evaluation abridgment 20 points o Has a strong, focused explanation of the sources using RC skills learned so far. o Supports the initial thesis with evidence (i. e. details from the source) and offers in-depth analysis of those details. Sources 10 points o Productively uses both the RC and the sources. o Features effective paraphrasing and selective quotation. Organization 10 points o Offers strong topic sentences that logically develop and extend the analysis (i. e. , no random accumulation of facts or bullet-point narrative). o Proceeds logically from one point to the succeeding(prenominal) in a climactic sequence. o Clearly links claims and evidence. o Uses smooth transitions between points. readability 10 points o Uses correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and MLA citation.