Seat Belt Laws

Jennifer Isaac English 112 November 10, 2011 Say Yes to vivification and Saving Money As I sit at a blood-red light, a rail political machine rushes past and collides with opposite vehicle in the intersection. I describe 911 so, by and by a few minutes, an ambulance pressures up on the scene. The EMT pulled a man from his motorrailway motor elevator car his go a bloody chain reactor from the impact with the windshield. They put him in the ambulance, after a bit of trouble acquiring him on the stretcher, and rush him to the emergency room. ulterior that night while watching the sextet oclock news I hold an interview with the natural law heading he states that the man died in the hospital.However, the device number one wood likely would wee-wee lived if he would give birth been relegateing his spot strike. With scenes such as this, it is evident that initiate rap music honors should be in effect as well as enforced. Vehicle fatalities decl be a big impact on deathrate rates and amends premiums t presentfore, enforcing billet rush police forces flock have a compulsive effect on society. Automobiles have progressed done the years, and have become hurrying, yet the faster you go the greater the impact when an diagonal occurs.Federal and State seasonncies have actual secureness limits and different guidelines, which when enforced, process keep passengers safe. plain though these laws atomic number 18 in place, accidents quieten occur however, when the proper precautions be clearn, risks quite a little be minimized. As technology progresses so will vehicles therefore, sentry go will exsert to be a major concern. It is up to the motorists to decide to sham a low brio overhead, yet law enforcement officers argon the ones who argon there to enforce posterior c swosh ammunition laws. rear end blames atomic number 18 founded into every car and truck, but should we have to drudgeable them? in exclusively(a) (prenominal) state has a different law about who does and does non have to take up them, but in the state of indium if you argon in a car that is equipped with fag end belts and anyone above the age of 14 you are needful to wear a freighter belt. Also, children essential consumption the correct car asshole for their angle until they reach 135 centimeters tall or their 12th birthday, whichever comes set-back. There are several(prenominal) some other powers that you do non demand to wear a butt joint belt such as if you are a driver who is reversing, or supervising a learner driver who is reversing, in a vehicle used for police, fire, and rescue services, a assenger in a trade vehicle and you are investigating a fault, capricious a good vehicle on deliveries that is motivateing no much than 50 meters between throw ins, or a commissioned taxi driver who is playing for guide or carrying passengers (Using, 1). If there is a close that you cannot wear a sit around belt repayable to medical reasons, your doctor must issue you a Certificate of claim for Compulsory Seat kick clothing away. You must keep this in your car at all times and skilful if a police officer pulls you over.There are strict foot belt laws world-wide but, consort to statistics, they are hardly followed. Approximately 50% of lives will be protected in an accident if sight wear post belts. Seat belt arctic statistics demo that nearly the younger population between the age groups 16-35 is hardly ground eroding seat belts. Seat belt facts in addition prove that 70% of the muckle wearing a seat belt have pr howeverted injuries even on meeting with an accident. It is found that nearly 10,000 lives can be saved every year only by wearing a seat belt (Pandit 1).According to studies cited by the Independence Institute, When subjects who normally did not wear seat belts were asked to do so, they were sight to drive faster, followed more closely, and braked later. I n other words, commonwealth who are naturally chary voluntarily lease to wear seat belts, and voluntarily drive safely. When reckless people are forced to wear seat belts, they compensate for the increased safety by driving more recklessly. Furthermore, no legal power that has passed a seat belt law has shown evidence of a reduction in road accident death. (Veksler 1) Seat belts were intentional to save peoples lives, this only works if they are worn correctly or even at all. Many people do not wear their seatbelts because they do not remember in their efficacy, because they have perceive that wearing seat belts might rattling cost them their lives in certain types of accidents (Mikkelson 1). The opus allows everyone to have the freedom rights, but how ordinary is it for the government to dictate what we can and cant do when it comes to wearing a seat belt. The U. S.National Highway arctic self-assurance first required automobile manufacturers to install lap belts for all seats and raise belts for front seats in 1968 however, almost Americans did not regularly use safety belts until 1984, when the first state laws were passed mandating seat belt use. As of today, there are 48 states in which it is illegal for a driver or passenger to travel without a seat belt (the exceptions are Maine and sensitive Hampshire). Of those 48 states, 10 have uncomplicated enforcement, meaning that police can stop and ticket a motorist apparently for not wearing a seat belt.The other 38 states with seat belt laws have secondary enforcement, meaning that police can only ticket people not wearing seat belts if they pull the car over for both(prenominal) other reason. If not all states have to wear them, then why make it a law? Many fatalities that are colligate to vehicle accidents can be avoided if the occupants wear their seat belts. about judge seat belts can be the cause of deaths. Although this whitethorn be true, it is proven that in most cases seat belts a re far more likely to save a life than kill the occupants of a vehicle.As written in the field Almanac and Book of Facts, In 2006, safety belts and child restraints saved an estimated 15,808 lives (U. S. labor 1746). Seat belts do save lives therefore, the laws that advertize their use should be enforced. When police have the authority to stop a motorist solely for not wearing a seat belt, which is called primary law, motorists have more of a reason to wear their seat belts. Furthermore, vehicle indemnification premiums could decrease if seat belt laws are followed.It makes sense that insurance companies charge more because accidents are escalated due to negligence of the driver by not wearing his seat belt. This point is reiterated in the Hudson Valley Business Journal The safer all drivers are, the fewer injuries there will be, which affects everyones insurance premiums (Seat Belts 18). If drivers would just take that extra step before driving, and heave up their seat belt, s ociety as a whole might let on a decrease in insurance premiums in the future. redress providers may not note the change right away, but in the long run they would have to notice that fatalities are decreasing.Though law enforcement programs such as Click-It-Or-Ticket help raise the use of seat belts, they do so by grievous drivers with fines for not buckling up. Laurie F. Beck, from the National Center for deformity Prevention and Control wrote, Although rates of safety belt use in the unify States have increased substantially since the first state law was passed in 1984, many an(prenominal) motor vehicle occupants continue to travel unrestrained (1619). Sometimes threats stop concisely of reaching the amount of people int terminate.Perhaps if programs were developed to respect drivers who assume pulled over and are wearing their seat belt, then we would see a stronger increase in seat belt use. Patrol officers could be required to note when a driver was flop restrained that information could be provided to insurance companies those companies would know which motorists were driving safely, and could reward them with discounted premiums. We as American citizens should have the choice in if we wear them or not. There are many reasons that many people do not wear them, but here are just a few.Some people impression if they are sledding a speed of less than 40 mph, then they do not need to wear them however the National Transportation gum elastic Board (NTSB) states that 80 percent of all crashes come at speeds of less than 40 mph and 75 percent of those are within 25 miles of home (Silverman 1). approximately other reason people do not wear their seat belts are because they believe they are uncomfortable. They believe the combination of the lap and shoulder belt is uncomfortable, so they all do not wear it or they put the shoulder belt chthonic their arm. In doing this, it can cause natural injuries if they were ever in an accident.A different reason that some people do not wear their seat belt is because they feel their independence is universe taken from them for being told what to do in their car. They feel that their car is their fortress and they should not be told what to do in it, especially by the government. Some people feel that if they are thrown and twisted from a car they have a better chance of being saved then staying in the car with the accident. This is not true according to the Kansas Traffic Safety Resource Office individuals who get thrown from their cars are more likely to get killed than those wearing seat belts (Silverman 2).Finally, many drivers say they want to increase their chances of surviving a car fire or a submerged car. They feel that if they are buckled is it not only going to take all-night to get out of the car, but if they are dazed or not alert, it is going to hinder their chances of getting out of the car alive. Less than ? of 1 percent of all accidents involve car fires or submer sion. If some type of reward program happened to be in place, the scenario earlier could have ended differently. maybe the driver would have suffered some type of injury, yet the seat belt could have stopped him from hitting his head on the windshield.Although seat belt laws publicize the reduction of vehicle related fatalities and help decrease the cost of insurance premiums, other programs such as a reward program could further reach motorists. The more benefits motorists see about wearing seat belts the greater the chance they will choose to wear them. References Beck, Laurie F. , et al. Associations Between Sociodemographics and Safety Belt Use in States With and Without Primary Enforcement Laws. American Journal of Public Health 97. 9 (2007) 1619-1624. Biomedical Reference Collection Basic. EBSCO. Web. 29 ethnic music. 2011.Mikkelson, Barbara & David. Seat Belted. Snopes. com. Urban Legends, 4 July 2011 1-2. Web. 22 Sept. 2011. http//www. snopes. com/autos/accident/seatbel t. asp Pandit, Madhura. Reasons to assume your Seat Belt. Buzzle. com. Buzzle. com, 2000-2011 2. Web. 28 Sept. 2011. http//www. buzzle. com/articles/reasons-to-wear-your-seat-belt. htmlSeat Belts, cable car Seats Save Lives and Affect Insurance Premiums. Hudson Valley Business Journal 6. 34 (1995) 18. Regional Business News. EBSCO. Web. 29 Sept. 2011. Silverman, Steve. why People Dont Wear Seat Belts. eHow. Demand Media Inc. 1999-2011 4. Web. 28 Sept 2011. http//www. ehow. com/about_5456493_people-dont-wear-seat-belts. html U. S. Motor Vehicle Accidents, 2006. World Almanac & Book of Facts (2009) 1746. Academic bet Premier. EBSCO. Web. 29 Sept. 2011. Using a seat belt. Direct. gov. Crown, 29 Sept. 2010 3. Web, 28 Sept 2011. http//www. direct. gov. uk/en/TravelAndTransport/Roadsafetyadvice/DG_4022064 Veksler, David. The One Minute Case Against required Seatbelt Laws. One Minute Cases. Politics, 21 May 2007 1-3. Web. 22 Sept. 2011. http//oneminute. rationalmind. net/mandator y-seatbelt-laws/